Every story and comment from the Hacker News API, in a layout borrowed from 2001.
A comment on Parents in poorer countries devote more time to their kids' homework. Parent comment
But the discussion went:
* original poster (HN1) made a general claim
* someone (HN2) answered with a sourced counter-argument for a specific case
* another commenter (HN3) said something like "good on you, but your source doesn't prove much cause it doesn't disprove all the other cases"
Conceptually, for me at least, I'd rank their statements, from good to bad: HN2 > HN1 >>>>> H3.
There are no comments on this comment yet.
But the discussion went:
* original poster (HN1) made a general claim
* someone (HN2) answered with a sourced counter-argument for a specific case
* another commenter (HN3) said something like "good on you, but your source doesn't prove much cause it doesn't disprove all the other cases"
Conceptually, for me at least, I'd rank their statements, from good to bad: HN2 > HN1 >>>>> H3.