News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Apple open-sources FoundationDB by chx on Thursday April 19, 2018 @03:40PM (#16879367)
> That API is gnarly.

Out of the many MongoDB criticisms, this one is valid. This https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/mongodb-frankenstein-monster-... article is quite right about it (note: endorsing the article does not mean I endorse its author by far).

Other than that, they totally did a fake it until you make it with MongoDB 3.4 passing Jepsen a year ago and MongoDB BI 2.0 containing their own SQL engine instead of wrapping PostgreSQL.

Re:Apple open-sources FoundationDB by aeorgnoieang on Friday April 20, 2018 @10:29AM (#16885019)
What specifically are you trying to avoid endorsing about the author of the LinkedIn post to which you linked? I couldn't find anything from a cursory web search.
Re:Apple open-sources FoundationDB by mst on Saturday April 21, 2018 @09:38AM (#16891376)
He runs lambdaconf, and refused to disinvite a speaker who many people felt shouldn't be permitted to speak because of his historical non-technical writings.

(I've tried to keep the above as dry as possible to avoid dragging the arguments around this situation into this thread - and I suspect the phrasing of the previous comment was also intended to try and avoid that, so let's see if we can keep it that way, please)

Re:Apple open-sources FoundationDB by chx on Sunday April 22, 2018 @05:09PM (#16898595)
You could try adding controversy to the author name and searching then. As mst correctly notes, I am trying to avoid reigniting said controversy while indicating my distaste.