Re:The latest trend for tech interviews: Days of unpaid home...
by frenchie14 on Thursday April 19, 2018 @12:51PM
(#16877488)
Scenario: you have two offers on hand. One offer is for a full time position. The other is for "let's see how the next one to two months goes and then we'll decide if you still have a job or not." Which do you pick? All things being equal, the first offer carries significantly less risk as an employee and is clearly the better choice. If you're an employer who really wants to hire engineers, why would you give an offer that will automatically filter out a large portion of qualified candidates?
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:The latest trend for tech interviews: Days of unpaid home...
by adrianmsmith on Thursday April 19, 2018 @01:01PM
(#16877600)
If I had the choice between a full time position with 3 days free coding prior, or "let's see how the next 1-2 months go" with no free prior coding, I'd chose the latter.
Re:The latest trend for tech interviews: Days of unpaid home...
by marssaxman on Thursday April 19, 2018 @07:44PM
(#16881120)
Those options both suck; I'd turn them both down. There are plenty of other places to work that will treat you like a professional.
Re:The latest trend for tech interviews: Days of unpaid home...
by poulsbohemian on Thursday April 19, 2018 @02:17PM
(#16878502)
But the reality is in many (most? all?) US states, employers can fire you for any reason. Sure you can nominally fire back with a wrongful termination suit, but the reality is you have little recourse. So really there is no difference in those two offers, other than one is being more explicit about their personnel practices.