News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:The latest trend for tech interviews: Days of unpaid home... by mylons on Thursday April 19, 2018 @12:29PM (#16877259)
licensing might not be a bad route, similar to a carpenter's license or a bar exam
Re:The latest trend for tech interviews: Days of unpaid home... by speby on Thursday April 19, 2018 @01:28PM (#16877907)
Licensing probably could work in this industry but it would be a tough nut to implement. For starters, as others have mentioned, with so much change happening, re-licensing would probably be needed, and of course that's a huge cost, a pain, and overhead as well. But then again, as I think about potential solutions, I am kind of coming up dry. Really need to mull on this some more.
Re:The latest trend for tech interviews: Days of unpaid home... by nrhk on Thursday April 19, 2018 @04:07PM (#16879629)
It can just be a general aptitude test done in several popular languages of your choice with some level of customization based on what sort of programmer you want to be.
Re:The latest trend for tech interviews: Days of unpaid home... by s73v3r_ on Thursday April 19, 2018 @04:54PM (#16880070)
For all the change that happens, though, the fundamentals are still the same.
Re:The latest trend for tech interviews: Days of unpaid home... by sigstoat on Thursday April 19, 2018 @12:38PM (#16877356)
plenty of garbage lawyers passing bar exams, and law firms don't just check that you've passed the bar and hire you.
Re:The latest trend for tech interviews: Days of unpaid home... by cakebrewery on Thursday April 19, 2018 @12:33PM (#16877308)
So, like certifications? Last I heard those are frowned upon in our industry.
Re:The latest trend for tech interviews: Days of unpaid home... by eeZah7Ux on Thursday April 19, 2018 @06:10PM (#16880609)
Only because they are too easy, or for profit, or focused on using a given product or unimportant concepts.
Re:The latest trend for tech interviews: Days of unpaid home... by praptak on Thursday April 19, 2018 @12:36PM (#16877338)
We won't get an agreement about the scope of the certification or even what answers are right. Too much change, too much opinions, too little rigor/science.