Re:Pinebook: An Affordable 64-bit ARM based Open Source Note...
by megy on Wednesday April 18, 2018 @12:29AM
(#16864617)
I bet this is cheaper, and lighter than your thinkpad, with a better battery and require less care.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Pinebook: An Affordable 64-bit ARM based Open Source Note...
by loser777 on Wednesday April 18, 2018 @12:54AM
(#16864728)
Cheap for good reason; an A53 quad core is Raspberry Pi 3 class. Hope every package you're gonna need is precompiled for arm64 because building anything nontrivial is not going to be fun.
Re:Pinebook: An Affordable 64-bit ARM based Open Source Note...
by geofft on Wednesday April 18, 2018 @01:12AM
(#16864805)
Can you not cross-compile from a cloud instance? It seems like compiling software would be a perfect fit for per-minute or per-second VMs.
Re:Pinebook: An Affordable 64-bit ARM based Open Source Note...
by RandomCSGeek on Wednesday April 18, 2018 @02:15AM
(#16865072)
I used a aws spot instance to compile GCC for Alpine Linux. It's a decent idea I think, especially if you already know what you need to do.
I had to do a lot of trial and error stuff to get it right, but anyway, I was having that spot instance sitting there almost idle, while using up the credits I got for free, so I had no issues with it.
The C5 instances are great for this kind of stuff.
Re:Pinebook: An Affordable 64-bit ARM based Open Source Note...
by phaer on Wednesday April 18, 2018 @01:48AM
(#16864968)
I got my x220 for 150€ plus 70€ (3 years ago, still running smooth) for a new replacement battery, so it's not directly comparable. The x220 might be a bit heavier but it's not too bad and I got a x86 cpu (i5-2540M) with 8GB of memory compared to the arm64 with 2GB in the pinebook. Considering the memory usage of many contemporary desktop programs thats makes quite a difference too me
Re:Pinebook: An Affordable 64-bit ARM based Open Source Note...
by limeblack on Wednesday April 18, 2018 @12:33AM
(#16864634)
I got this thinkpad without hard drive for under $100 so they are a lot closer then some would have guessed.
Re:Pinebook: An Affordable 64-bit ARM based Open Source Note...
by msh on Wednesday April 18, 2018 @12:37AM
(#16864659)
And how long does its battery last?
Re:Pinebook: An Affordable 64-bit ARM based Open Source Note...
by examancer on Wednesday April 18, 2018 @12:48AM
(#16864710)
10000mah and an ARM A53 mean it should last 10 hours or more with moderate brightness settings. It's hard to beat this for a light cheap terminal/browser with plenty of battery if that is something you need.
Re:Pinebook: An Affordable 64-bit ARM based Open Source Note...
by crowbahr on Wednesday April 18, 2018 @01:52AM
(#16864979)
Reviews I read said 4-6 hours. Poorly optimized probably.
Re:Pinebook: An Affordable 64-bit ARM based Open Source Note...
by jandrese on Wednesday April 18, 2018 @11:30AM
(#16868146)
I bet it's software compositing. GPU acceleration doesn't work on those boards last time I checked, so it's probably having to do a lot more work on the CPU. It would also explain why it feels so sluggish despite being on paper more powerful than a Raspberry Pi. You should probably forget about trying to play video on it.
Re:Pinebook: An Affordable 64-bit ARM based Open Source Note...
by larkeith on Wednesday April 18, 2018 @12:42AM
(#16864684)
Can't speak for parent, but my T430s lasts for three or four hours, despite longterm heavy battery use. Beware of Lenovo's rootkits if looking to buy from them, however.
Re:Pinebook: An Affordable 64-bit ARM based Open Source Note...
by Stratoscope on Wednesday April 18, 2018 @01:07AM
(#16864785)
ThinkPads never had the rootkits, it was the consumer Lenovo models that had them. Very different culture between those two groups.