News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Facebook Container for Firefox by loeg on Tuesday April 17, 2018 @08:38PM (#16863667)
I've definitely run into problems with ecommerce sites (really just Tarsnap) and embedded iframes from 3rd party payment services, while using the Chrome equivalent of this Firefox setting.
Re:Facebook Container for Firefox by cperciva on Wednesday April 18, 2018 @04:02AM (#16865584)
In case it's useful: This was due to a bug in Chrome which has since been fixed. (Chrome was losing the "POST" flag when sending a redirect message between processes.)
Re:Facebook Container for Firefox by loeg on Thursday April 19, 2018 @02:29AM (#16873768)
Any idea what version of Chrome fixed it? I refill my Tarsnap balance only occasionally.
Re:Facebook Container for Firefox by cperciva on Thursday April 19, 2018 @03:57AM (#16874118)
The bug was fixed on January 26th and was being merged to older supported branches expeditiously -- I don't know the exact version numbers but I'm sure that any releases they rolled after mid-February would have the fix.
Re:Facebook Container for Firefox by loeg on Thursday April 19, 2018 @08:04PM (#16881197)
I guess 65.0.3325.146 from March 5th probably works, then. Thanks!
Re:Facebook Container for Firefox by andai on Tuesday April 17, 2018 @08:44PM (#16863702)
How do you do this in Chrome?
Re:Facebook Container for Firefox by loeg on Thursday April 19, 2018 @02:28AM (#16873767)
chrome://flags/#enable-site-per-process

Strict site isolation > Enable.

Re:Facebook Container for Firefox by mirthflat83 on Tuesday April 17, 2018 @10:07PM (#16864063)
Using profiles I guess