Re:France’s government is building its own encrypted messeng...
by isolli on Tuesday April 17, 2018 @04:23AM
(#16856493)
Such a comment is meaningless without context. How often do corporate IT projects fail? How often do government IT projects fail?
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:France’s government is building its own encrypted messeng...
by loup-vaillant on Tuesday April 17, 2018 @09:02AM
(#16857841)
The problem is not really about corporate vs government, it's about size.
These folks tend to think big. Everything else stems from that. What they really need is a little app with simple messaging, end to end encryption, and a server that doesn't log anything they don't want it to log. What they are likely to get if they pay some big shot contractor big money to do it is a Swiss army knife the size of a kitchen sink. With bugs.
Re:France’s government is building its own encrypted messeng...
by icebraining on Tuesday April 17, 2018 @04:40AM
(#16856551)
How is the corporate failure rate relevant?
Re:France’s government is building its own encrypted messeng...
by isolli on Tuesday April 17, 2018 @08:54AM
(#16857798)
It is relevant because IT projects are inherently difficult, and many of them fail. Just because the French government failed at two projects mentioned in the original comment does not mean that a) it's particularly bad at IT projects or b) it will necessarily fail again. Having the corporate failure rate as a baseline could help assess the proficiency of governments around the world.
Re:France’s government is building its own encrypted messeng...
by coldtea on Tuesday April 17, 2018 @04:53AM
(#16856602)
It is if the grandparent meant to disparage government IT projects (compared to corporate IT projects) -- which is a possible reading.
(It's also relevant because because we pay corporations with subsidies, tax cuts, tax evasion, research grants, public procurement, specialty laws favoring them, etc -- sometimes even more than we pay governments).