Re:Time to rebuild the web?
by johnfactorial on Monday April 16, 2018 @10:43AM
(#16849292)
... and Wikipedia and NPR are excellent if imperfect versions of that model.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Time to rebuild the web?
by philangist on Monday April 16, 2018 @12:07PM
(#16850000)
Both of which are constantly asking for donations
In case you were curious, the Wikimedia Foundation has plenty of money to keep their sites running. Most of their funds are going to other projects, like conferences and "Wikipedia-in-a-box" type stuff. [1] [2]
[1]: http://mywikibiz.com/Top_10_Reasons_Not_to_Donate_to_Wikiped...
[2]: Despite linking to "reasons not to donate to Wikipedia," I'd still prefer more sites run like Wikipedia and less sites run like YouTube, and I think you should donate to the Wikimedia Foundation if you're a power user. Do not donate to the Wikimedia Foundation unless you're heavily involved in their wikis, but if you are heavily involved and have the money, you should. Their donors need to hold them accountable, and that's not possible if they're getting tons of money from people who have no idea what's going on behind the scenes.
The idea that something in the commons should be funded by the majority isn't a new one. At this point the debate turns into an argument on tax policy and its peripherals...
I don't think that debate will end until we all create some sort of hive mind AI by networking our brains together.