Re:Hackett – A Haskell-like language with support for Racket...
by bjoli on Sunday April 15, 2018 @05:22AM
(#16841953)
I have found the sentiment to be more "we don't need macros, we have a proper type system/laziness/whatever".
I know enough Haskell to know that many of the macros I would use in scheme aren't necessary, but it is not like the good parts of compile time code generation are completely negated.
I know enough Haskell to know that many of the macros I would use in scheme aren't necessary, but it is not like the good parts of compile time code generation are completely negated.