News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Assumptions about how children learn to read have been di... by sverige on Saturday April 14, 2018 @12:43PM (#16838103)
The percentages of kids who didn't speak English at home were pretty high 100 years ago, too, but they definitely were better at reading English then. The problem isn't effort. The problem is recognizing that there is value in learning to read.
Re:Assumptions about how children learn to read have been di... by concrete-faucet on Saturday April 14, 2018 @02:14PM (#16838617)
Where I live, there are gifted schools for kids that speak Polish, Spanish and Russian. Their only goal for English is to make sure the child is proficient by the 6th grade.

The kids section at the local library branch (there is one in every neighborhood) will have half the books in English and the rest in whatever languages are common in that neighborhood.

Language barriers are only a problem if your local city makes them one.

My son is in 3rd grade and his NWEA MAP reading score put him at the 11/12 grade level, so he got put into an advanced reader class. In the fall, they read books about history, wrote about and discussed them in class. This spring, the teach chose a young adult novel that I guess is entirely appropriate from a reading-level point of view. But some of the subject matter goes way over the heads of the kids and other stuff in the book is disturbing to them. Our son simply refused to finish reading the book. The teacher wasn't going to switch books because a couple kids didn't like it, and the class depended on discussing what they read... What can you do but stop reading and/or drop out of the class?

Re:Assumptions about how children learn to read have been di... by wiredfool on Saturday April 14, 2018 @02:33PM (#16838732)
That is really hard. My oldest was reading at roughly that spread, and finding books that were emotionally approriate but also engaging at his reading level was difficult. It took a long time for him to read Harry Potter because it was just too dark. It didn’t help that he’d tear through trilogies in a day or two. You might win once or twice, but a week later you're in the same boat again.
Re:Assumptions about how children learn to read have been di... by quantumofmalice on Saturday April 14, 2018 @01:10PM (#16838238)
> pretty high 100 years ago

irrelevant: there are no hard numbers for that and that's not the timeframe the article is discussing (since the 90s)

Re:Assumptions about how children learn to read have been di... by ticviking on Saturday April 14, 2018 @02:18PM (#16838638)
Why on earth would that be irrelavant?

Also I'm quite sure the numbers are there, maybe not as crisp as you like, but one could make some reasonable estimates based on immigration records from ellis island and the census through those periods.

Re:Assumptions about how children learn to read have been di... by watwut on Saturday April 14, 2018 @02:29PM (#16838711)
It is irrelevant, because comparison was not done with literacy of people 100 years ago.

Which would also be 1918 which is first world was and results back then were likely to he affected by that big time. And it was also time of racial segregation which would affect a lot too.