News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Power9 Benchmarks vs. Intel Xeon vs. AMD EPYC Performance... by mping on Friday April 13, 2018 @10:42AM (#16830400)
I believe the fair comparison would be performance per dollar - comparing similarly priced components. Same sockets and cores can have wildly different costs.
Re:Power9 Benchmarks vs. Intel Xeon vs. AMD EPYC Performance... by zrm on Friday April 13, 2018 @11:16AM (#16830748)
Comparing like with like can give you a better idea of what's going on even if the prices aren't the same. It's a matter of isolating the architecture from the other factors. If a 40 core 2P Intel system is faster than a 32 core 1P AMD system, you don't know if the difference is architectural or just the extra cores and sockets, so you don't know whether to expect a 48 core 2P AMD system to be faster or slower than the Intel system.

And the tested systems aren't equivalently priced here either.

Re:Power9 Benchmarks vs. Intel Xeon vs. AMD EPYC Performance... by rch on Friday April 13, 2018 @12:28PM (#16831516)
I still need to see raw performance: single core, multi-core single socket, and multi-socket.
Re:Power9 Benchmarks vs. Intel Xeon vs. AMD EPYC Performance... by inasio on Friday April 13, 2018 @10:59AM (#16830568)
Per dollar of CPU, CPU + power, CPU + motherboard, TCO?