News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:SpaceX's Valuation Climbs to $25B with New Funding Round by acd10j on Friday April 13, 2018 @04:28AM (#16828041)
Does anybody else worry about having Wall-E kind of situation, Commercial space launch being cheap, We might end up having lots of space junk. At least with the previous price point, this was less probable.
Re:SpaceX's Valuation Climbs to $25B with New Funding Round by Denzel on Friday April 13, 2018 @05:34AM (#16828340)
Space is vast... far bigger than you're imagining. Probably the best analogy, that I've heard, to put your mind at ease: think about how many cars are on the road today.

There are about 1 billion cars.

Is the surface of Earth crowded?

Well, not only is the surface area of a single sphere in low-earth orbit (LEO) bigger than the surface area of Earth, you have to remember we're dealing with volume. We can move in three dimensions and thus there are many "surfaces".

There's an order of magnitude more space for things in space. ;)

We're not even going to get close to delivering 1 billion objects to orbit anytime soon. And even then, it wouldn't be crowded.

Re:SpaceX's Valuation Climbs to $25B with New Funding Round by jessriedel on Friday April 13, 2018 @05:54AM (#16828433)
This is true, but the very high orbital speeds means there can be a surprisingly high frequency of collisions even at extremely low density.
Re:SpaceX's Valuation Climbs to $25B with New Funding Round by Denzel on Friday April 13, 2018 @12:07PM (#16831308)
That's also true. Do you have any material I could read on how this frequency increases with the rate of spacecrafts deployed?
Re:SpaceX's Valuation Climbs to $25B with New Funding Round by schiffern on Friday April 13, 2018 @08:54PM (#16835189)
A good place to start might be the original paper by Donald Kessler, "Collision Frequency of Artificial Satellites: The Creation of a Debris Belt" http://webpages.charter.net/dkessler/files/Collision%20Frequ...
Re:SpaceX's Valuation Climbs to $25B with New Funding Round by strgcmc on Friday April 13, 2018 @01:30PM (#16832067)
This is actually a really great analogy for not the reason you're thinking, because of the fairly common incidence of car accidents.

Sure, the surface of the earth is not crowded due to the volume of cars. But that doesn't mean that car traffic is trivially easy to solve or travel is automagically safe.

Space flight safety should mirror (or be better than) air travel safety (in accidents per mile terms); if space flight becomes more like cars, then space flight is probably screwed.

Re:SpaceX's Valuation Climbs to $25B with New Funding Round by gnclmorais on Friday April 13, 2018 @04:32AM (#16828062)
That will probably create another industry sector, so I’m not worried.
Re:SpaceX's Valuation Climbs to $25B with New Funding Round by neolefty on Friday April 13, 2018 @08:51AM (#16829462)
Crowded in LEO and the narrow ring of GEO, but elsewhere it's pretty open.

An orbit that would be opened up by cheaper launch services is VLEO (very low earth orbit) where orbits decay in a year or two. There's virtually no debris there because of the decay, and if you can launch cheaply enough, you can treat your satellites in that orbit as disposable--an ongoing expense rather than a capital expense.

Re:SpaceX's Valuation Climbs to $25B with New Funding Round by stedaniels on Friday April 13, 2018 @04:41AM (#16828095)
There are already companies our there that track all this junk (a percentage of it at the moment) and even companies proposing ways to clean it up.