Most English 'grammer' discussed in the Anglophone world (split infinitives WTF? English doesn't have infinitives) is gibberish...
I ran, she ran, he ran, they ran, we ran, y'all ran.
I run, she runs, he runs, they run, we run, y'all run.
I'll run, she'll run, he'll run, they'll run, we'll run, y'all'll run.
I thought I'd run, he thought he'd run, they thought they'd run.
We'll have wished we ran, they'll have wished they ran, he'll have wished he ran.
What exactly do you want to teach here? The only weirdness to the rule is that he and she runs with an "s", everything else is the same.
I love you. You love me. They love him. He loves them.
I want you. You want me. They want him. He wants them.
In Russian the above is far different because the word order can be switched for emphasis.
The only thing in English worth teaching is "I have" vs "I am" and almost every language has that same problem as well (Je suis vs J'ai in French).
The hard part with English is that our spelling makes zero sense, unlike Russian or French. The grammar is really quite straightforward.
Even verb morphology is a bit more complex than you've called out here.
For a period in the UK there was no English grammar taught in schools. This caused me great problems in Russian class (second high school language) as I had no idea there were cases in English and so had no reference for why a case was needed and what it did. The entirety of my English grammar training was learning a poem by rote for homework, which I didn't do ("A nouns the name of anything [...]"). I learnt the little grammar I know from French lessons. So, YMMV depending on the English speaker.