Re:Tesla issues strongest statement yet blaming driver for d...
by chrisper on Wednesday April 11, 2018 @04:45PM
(#16815400)
Autoland is also a safety feature for manned aircraft because it allows you to land in bad visibility or avoid accidents like the one at SFO a couple of years ago.
Re:Tesla issues strongest statement yet blaming driver for d...
by greglindahl on Wednesday April 11, 2018 @07:03PM
(#16816584)
Excessive reliance on features like autoland was actually the cause of that SFO accident, according to the NTSB.
Re:Tesla issues strongest statement yet blaming driver for d...
by chrisper on Wednesday April 11, 2018 @11:42PM
(#16817794)
But ILS (the autoland system on ground) was disabled that day. Are we talking about two different incidents?
Re:Tesla issues strongest statement yet blaming driver for d...
by greglindahl on Thursday April 12, 2018 @01:01AM
(#16818140)
No, did you read the accident report which talked about the pilots being unable to land the plane because they were used to the computer doing most of the work?
For unmanned aircraft, autoland is an safety feature. After loss of link, an autopilot might be configured to land at a designated location, rather than just circling until it runs out of fuel and drops out of the sky. Though admittedly, crashing in a safe place is less serious when the vehicle has no people in it.
The Tesla autopilot needs much closer supervision than any of the autopilots I've worked with. That's more a result of its domain than of its sophistication, but it still makes me very uncomfortable with the name.