Re:Testimony of Mark Zuckerberg – Hearing Before US House of...
by CodeCube on Monday April 09, 2018 @01:16PM
(#16794911)
"initial push" being the operative term ... posts can be shared to a broad audience by giving fb money, which they did.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Testimony of Mark Zuckerberg – Hearing Before US House of...
by giarc on Monday April 09, 2018 @01:53PM
(#16795253)
So boosting the post, but that wouldn't count as a political ad. I'd like to see what Facebook would count as a "political ad".
The top image here (http://nymag.com/selectall/2017/11/house-democrats-release-r...) is one of these Russia ads. However, I wouldn't call that a political ad, just a terrible meme that happens to be about Clinton and the election.
Re:Testimony of Mark Zuckerberg – Hearing Before US House of...
by jaawn on Monday April 09, 2018 @02:39PM
(#16795707)
Obviously we don't know yet, but I would be absolutely shocked if they don't basically flag everything about well-known politicians as "political", and paying to boost something like that should fall under the new restrictions. It would be trivial for most large tech companies to make an automatic "political post" classifier at this point. The post "boosting" use case is a pretty easy target too because blocking someone from paying to boost something is fairly low-risk.