News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Detecting Methane from Miles Away by anonytrary on Monday April 09, 2018 @04:25AM (#16791300)
I think they missed a great title opportunity. A "fart detector that works a mile away" seems to be great way to phrase it; it's concise, easy to imagine, relatable and comical. The article could then go into the specifics of what the detector actually picks up (e.g. CH4).

I find the diffusion of the smell of flatulence to be a better comparison, because it invokes a visceral reaction ("eww", "yuck", etc.). Imagining a device which does this seems easier. I have a worse idea of what "1/4 of a human exhalation" means.

Re:Detecting Methane from Miles Away by evrydayhustling on Monday April 09, 2018 @06:44AM (#16791856)
Unfortunately for the fart detector (but fortunately for us!), human farts average around 100ml [1], whereas an adult male breath averages about 500ml [2]. That could still be sorted out for your title, but we also have to consider that a fart is only about 7% methane [3]. This suggests the one mile sensitivity is going to be at around 18 simultaneous average farts, or 5 at the record-breaking end of the scale -- conditions which might indeed justify further surveying the region at altitude.

If we're willing to get closer than a mile (questionable in the above scenario), we can apply an inverse law for gas diffusion [4] (I was surprised it wasn't inverse square!) and find that the apparatus can can detect a single average fart at a distance of around 30 feet -- easily covering most elementary school classrooms and automating away the "whom smelt it dealt it" dilemma.

[1] https://www.chemistryworld.com/news/explainer-the-chemistry-... [2] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tidal_volume [3] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flatulence [4] https://physics.stackexchange.com/questions/290059/inverse-s...

Re:Detecting Methane from Miles Away by kragen on Monday April 09, 2018 @08:20AM (#16792322)
Methane doesn't smell of flatulence; that smell consists of much larger molecules, which diffuse correspondingly much more slowly, and whose distribution is therefore more affected by advection.
Re:Detecting Methane from Miles Away by ggambetta on Monday April 09, 2018 @08:16AM (#16792287)
Sounds like a real-life version of Futurama's Smelloscope?
Re:Detecting Methane from Miles Away by gsaga on Monday April 09, 2018 @05:19AM (#16791520)
And the comment of the year award goes to...