>"Generally speaking, the SAT is not very important," said Marilyn McGrath, director of undergraduate admissions at No. 1 ranked Harvard College.
https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2013/03/28/admiss...
From my experience, both being an Asian and being surrounded by them, Asians are good at getting into universities/jobs/whatever because they very consciously try to play the "game".
It could be SAT scores, algorithm questions, vocabulary, ability to play an instrument, etc.
All of my friends knew or at least thought they knew what universities cared about, and then got extra schooling to prepare exactly those things. Some people even hire people to help them write their essays who I guess are "experts" at writing applications.
Or maybe I am naive
If that is true, then the suit has merit.
Asian-Americans score great in standardized tests, (for both genetic and cultural reasons), but high SAT scores soon becomes a problem of 'overfitting', where SAT scores are a great indicator of success in life, they are still only one dimension of success indicator.
If you create a system where it accepts/rejects candidates only on one dimension (SAT scores), you will soon end up with a flawed system. Also, spending all your time in studying standardized tests, will make you overfitted in one dimension. Real life is not one giant standardized test.
AI 102
As for colleges they should have a transparent admission criteria, as right now it is very subjective and will be obviously been seen as flawed.
Eg.
30% is SAT Scores
30% is your high school gpa
20% is you curriculum and activities
20% is other shit we think is important, etc...
then you will know where you stand