News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Fifty or Sixty Years of Processor Development for This? by orbital-decay on Wednesday April 04, 2018 @03:40AM (#16752803)
It's the same with semiconductors though, the barrier is mostly economical.
Re:Fifty or Sixty Years of Processor Development for This? by Dylan16807 on Wednesday April 04, 2018 @04:00AM (#16752898)
Has the budget for semiconductor research ever decreased? It's a tautology that we could be spending more money on it, but we are deeply investing in this field in a way that we stopped doing with space.
Re:Fifty or Sixty Years of Processor Development for This? by donquichotte on Wednesday April 04, 2018 @03:57AM (#16752887)
Is it? I was under the impression that we are hitting physical barriers, like transistor size getting closer and closer to Silicon atom size.
Re:Fifty or Sixty Years of Processor Development for This? by orbital-decay on Wednesday April 04, 2018 @04:18AM (#16752972)
It's still technically possible to make chips with smaller nodes than the current mainstream processes allow, although this is uneconomical due to low yields and extremely thin margins.
Re:Fifty or Sixty Years of Processor Development for This? by duncan_bayne on Wednesday April 04, 2018 @04:31AM (#16753034)
Right, so "Moore's law is dead" really scoped to "... affordable, conventional materials and designs that we've almost finished wringing every scrap of ROI out of".

(That's not meant to be pejorative. Just saying I understand why companies would be loathe to ditch proven tooling w/ a lot of sunk costs).