Re:Google maps shows location of San Bruno shooting
by stale2002 on Tuesday April 03, 2018 @08:02PM
(#16750656)
> It probably doesn't mean what I think, either, yet we're all still perfectly capable of understanding GP's point
The 1994 assault weapons ban implemented by gun control advocates defines it as a gun with a bayonet mount on it (among other cosmetic definitions that it used).
So going by that definition, I would be curious as to why the OP wants to ban bayonet mounts.
Perhaps that is unfair but that is the literal definition that gun control advocates used!
Lets say the OP is instead talking about semi automatic weapons as at least rate of fire is a quality that a reasonable person could identify as being dangerous.
If they are talking about that, we'll then I'd like to point out that basically all weapons are semi automatic.
So that means that the OP either wants to ban bayonet mounts or wants to ban almost all guns.
The 1994 assault weapons ban implemented by gun control advocates defines it as a gun with a bayonet mount on it (among other cosmetic definitions that it used).
So going by that definition, I would be curious as to why the OP wants to ban bayonet mounts.
Perhaps that is unfair but that is the literal definition that gun control advocates used!
Lets say the OP is instead talking about semi automatic weapons as at least rate of fire is a quality that a reasonable person could identify as being dangerous.
If they are talking about that, we'll then I'd like to point out that basically all weapons are semi automatic.
So that means that the OP either wants to ban bayonet mounts or wants to ban almost all guns.
Both of these positions I'd regard as ridiculous.