News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Ask HN: Why does P2P encrypted messaging still suck? by craftyguy on Tuesday April 03, 2018 @12:21PM (#16746245)
> Plus, you can bridge to IRC

I tried this recently. I really wanted it to work. However, it was a complete mess, mainly frequent (and prolonged) disconnects on the bridge. For folks who primarily use Matrix but would like to occasionally pop into IRC channels, it's probably OK. For folks that need a reliable IRC connection, don't bother.

Re:Ask HN: Why does P2P encrypted messaging still suck? by Aaronn on Tuesday April 03, 2018 @02:13PM (#16747470)
You are probably using one of the IRC bridges that is on the matrix.org server. The matrix.org server is having a lot of problems with being DDoSed as well as not being able to keep up with the normal traffic. The next generation homeserver written in Go is supposed to help with this a lot.

There is nothing inherently broken with Matrix <-> IRC bridges, it is just that one server. Other servers are bridging to IRC perfectly fine and you are welcome to host your own.

Re:Ask HN: Why does P2P encrypted messaging still suck? by secfirstmd on Tuesday April 03, 2018 @01:14PM (#16746855)
Agreed. Also another issue was that I Tested and trained a number of NGOs on it and the general feedback was that there were too many options on it when it came to rooms, sharing etc. As a techie I love it, but the general response was that it was too complex to use.
Re:Ask HN: Why does P2P encrypted messaging still suck? by uhoreg on Tuesday April 03, 2018 @05:07PM (#16749246)
The UI could definitely be improved, but the core team has recently hired a UI designer, so hopefully this will improve in the future. If you have any other feedback that you've heard from your trainings, I'm sure the core team would love to hear about it either in their issue tracker (e.g. github.com/vector-im/riot-web/issues for Riot web), or in the Matrix rooms (#riot:matrix.org or #matrix:matrix.org).