2. Power corrupts, so the overall answer is: never.
Change from below requires organization and coordination, and those things require leadership.
Were MLK or Ghandi fascist, because they were effective leaders?
Frankly, I find more of a fascistic tinge in the stock HN response to surveillance:
- Governments will never do anything; democracy is not fit for purpose
- A ‘natural elite’ of hacker Übermensch can avoid dystopia for themselves with hacking skills and expensive crypto currencies. The masses cannot be saved as they are inherently stupid and submissive. Things will always get worse, especially for them; abandon them.
Why such fatalism? The GDPR hasn’t even hit the books yet, and it’s having a transformative effect on how large US tech companies process data for everyone. We’re just beginning to see the tide turn on public opinion on Facebook.
I’ve hope for popular interest in privacy and anti-authoritarianism yet.
Leadership + time = fascism
That MLK and Gandhi were saved from their Hitlerism by assassination by heroic ethnic-separatists?
That's how you ended up with a surveillance society in the first place, silly.
Future strong leaders will employ all of those means of deep state surveillance and invest in new ones in order to remain strong.
That cats out of the bag and it ain’t going back.