Re:Why “blockchain” is BS in 4 slides
by jason_slack on Tuesday April 03, 2018 @09:46AM
(#16744518)
That makes sense. Thanks for explaining. They really just mean a ledger. Doesn't one lose the trust if the ledger is not distributed and verified by outsiders? Using a trusted set of validators, I assume is an internal operation. They aren't asking "Joe Nobody" off the street to become a trusted validator...
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Why “blockchain” is BS in 4 slides
by EthanHeilman on Wednesday April 04, 2018 @11:04AM
(#16755388)
The hope is that the validator set would include many different trustworthy organizations in different parts of the world.
Re:Why “blockchain” is BS in 4 slides
by moocowtruck on Wednesday April 04, 2018 @12:54PM
(#16756564)
could all these validators agree at their own whims to roll back their ledger to undo a change?