I'm not trying to be nit-picky, this seriously is confusing for me (probably no small-part due to marketing).

Dead animal and the fire are definitely part of Homo, especially Homo Sapiens.

You can call that a Paleo diet if you will, I don't, as the term as been tainted by quackery (see also: Superfood).

But you're obviously capable of doing any number of harmful processes on your own, it's just somewhat unlikely. Most people aren't incentivized to process their own foods for optimal shelf life and profitability over nutrition and health.

I suspect everyone's definition varies.

"animals products" - We have been omnivores since before the genus Homo evolved. Our physiology has evolved to extract nutrition from animal products efficiently. A herbivore diet isn't sufficient for our species. Even our closest relatives, Chimpanzees, eat meat.

And by all mean, you are still free to read all the papers if you have the time, but that is probably a one man job just for the blueberries.

So? Evolution doesn't optimize for the lifespan we're targeting currently.

The fact is, Greger is not a scientist. Science requires honest investigation, and a willingness to update one’s beliefs. Greger is an activist — he has already decided what his beliefs are, and he is selectively choosing to emphasize studies that support his beliefs (while ignoring those that don’t).

I wouldn’t have a problem with this if his site was called veganopinions.org. You’re allowed to have beliefs based on morality, not science. But when you corrupt the science to advance your cause, you’ve lost me entirely.