1.1.1.1: Fast, privacy-first consumer DNS service

Re:1.1.1.1: Fast, privacy-first consumer DNS service by chrissnell on Sunday April 01, 2018 @04:40PM (#16730326)

Many privacy activists believe that the best proof of a no-logging assertion is for a court to order a provider to turn over logs and for the company to be unable to do so.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:1.1.1.1: Fast, privacy-first consumer DNS service by geofft on Sunday April 01, 2018 @06:09PM (#16730791)

Isn't the court system mostly powered by the threat of serious jail time if you're found to be lying, and penalties for your lawyers, too?

If you say "We don't have those logs," and you swear to it and a lawyer puts their name on the filing, it's not like Judge Alsup will start pentesting your company to find the one employee who accidentally has Dropbox pointed at an sftp mount of some production server.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:1.1.1.1: Fast, privacy-first consumer DNS service by ethics_gradient on Sunday April 01, 2018 @05:28PM (#16730540)

Signal did a version of that with the help of aclu.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:1.1.1.1: Fast, privacy-first consumer DNS service by biot on Sunday April 01, 2018 @05:17PM (#16730486)

And to prove that they are unable to do so, would they need to get audited?

[ Parent | on HN ]