Re:Buzzword Convergence: Making Sense of Quantum Neural Bloc...
by l9k on Sunday April 01, 2018 @01:27PM
(#16729391)
Would it be possible?
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Buzzword Convergence: Making Sense of Quantum Neural Bloc...
by notfed on Sunday April 01, 2018 @01:34PM
(#16729414)
It looks that the default Hash implementation depends on whether the system is 32-bit or 64-bit [1]. It's also not clearly documented what the default implementation of Hash really is.
On a 32-bit system, yes, someone could probably do it.
Re:Buzzword Convergence: Making Sense of Quantum Neural Bloc...
by Smaug123 on Sunday April 01, 2018 @01:34PM
(#16729410)
Probably. There are only 2^64 possible hash values (Mathematica's Hash function, with no method specified, produces a 32- or 64-bit output depending on platform), and there are many more strings than that which could reasonably be called a "paragraph". It's pretty reasonable to hope that there's a self-describing paragraph out there somewhere.
Re:Buzzword Convergence: Making Sense of Quantum Neural Bloc...
by repsilat on Sunday April 01, 2018 @02:24PM
(#16729693)
Hah, "could in theory" vs "could in practice" -- depending on the hash function, it could take hundreds or thousands of processor-years. Maybe Google could do it.
http://m.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=2%5E64+things+%2F+%281+bi...
Re:Buzzword Convergence: Making Sense of Quantum Neural Bloc...
by bluesign on Sunday April 01, 2018 @05:13PM
(#16730469)
Actually for any given paragraph, probabilty of hash(paragraph+hash) = hash is pretty high.
Re:Buzzword Convergence: Making Sense of Quantum Neural Bloc...
by svantana on Sunday April 01, 2018 @06:03PM
(#16730760)
You mean that there exists at least one hash such that hashFunc(paragraph+hash) = hash? Yup, that probability converges to 1-exp(-1) = 63%. So it's no guarantee, but if you have some wiggle room in the paragraph (change the wording slightly etc) you can probably make it work.