Re:Giraffes Added to the Endangered Species List (2016)
by abpavel on Friday March 30, 2018 @01:32PM
(#16718081)
Coming from a human?
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Giraffes Added to the Endangered Species List (2016)
by neinzero on Friday March 30, 2018 @01:46PM
(#16718210)
As opposed to which other species on Hacker News?
Population control only means to limit human populations to a responsible and sustainable level, and brings economic benefits to other humans as well as animals, so I don't understand your sentiment.
Re:Giraffes Added to the Endangered Species List (2016)
by matthewwiese on Friday March 30, 2018 @01:41PM
(#16718161)
Not the parent, but until giraffes and other endangered species can speak for themselves, these statements will keep coming from us.
Although the point could've still been made without sounding misanthropic...
[dead]
Re:Giraffes Added to the Endangered Species List (2016)
by vlunkr on Friday March 30, 2018 @01:54PM
(#16718295)
Good thing your parents didn't think the way you do huh?
Re:Giraffes Added to the Endangered Species List (2016)
by Mononokay on Friday March 30, 2018 @02:09PM
(#16718444)
Western countries aren't nearly as overpopulated as most Eastern countries. Compare the States, one of the larger Western countries, to China. Or India.
It's absolutely an issue, but the West is a saint compared to the East right now.
Re:Giraffes Added to the Endangered Species List (2016)
by hhw on Friday March 30, 2018 @04:14PM
(#16719451)
Yet the US has double the carbon footprint per capita of China and more than 8x that of India. It would be much easier for Western countries to cut their resource consumption in half than for Eastern countries to cut their population in half.
Re:Giraffes Added to the Endangered Species List (2016)
by NiklasMort on Friday March 30, 2018 @01:59PM
(#16718340)
that's literally "ad hominem" & what kind of answer you want to hear now? a) yes I wish too b) lucky me ? in either case it doesn't provide any good points to a solution