News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Former Equifax Executive Charged with Insider Trading by JumpCrisscross on Thursday March 29, 2018 @10:43PM (#16713279)
> They always make the little guy take the fall

Taking the fall means "to bear the blame or punishment for another person's failure or misdeed" [1]. Ying is being charged with his own crimes alone.

Furthermore, we have no evidence about whether (a) the other executives actually committed a violation, (b) Ying is the only one who left a prosecutable paper trail or (c) Ying will take a plea deal and co-operate against the others.

[1] https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/take_the_fall

Re:Former Equifax Executive Charged with Insider Trading by craigc on Thursday March 29, 2018 @10:50PM (#16713321)
You are right. I am not stating a fact. It is my opinion that this guy is being used as a sacrificial lamb because I have seen things like this happen time and time again.

Also seems like a pretty big coincidence that the others sold off their shares immediately after hearing about the breach, but it was unrelated.

Re:Former Equifax Executive Charged with Insider Trading by JumpCrisscross on Thursday March 29, 2018 @11:13PM (#16713414)
> but it was unrelated

That has not yet been concluded. This could be the first move in a series of charges.

That or Ying was uniquely stupid. He texted his direct report “on the phone with [global CIO]. Sounds bad. We may be the one breached. . . . Starting to put 2 and 2 together" [1] before exercising "all of his vested options to buy Equifax shares, and then immediately [selling] those Equifax shares for total proceeds of more than $950,000" (§ 49) an hour after searching for "(1) 'Experian breach'; (2) 'Experian stock price 9/15/2015'; and (3) 'Experian breach 2015'" on the Internet (§ 42).

[1] https://www.sec.gov/litigation/complaints/2018/comp-pr2018-4... § 31

Re:Former Equifax Executive Charged with Insider Trading by nafey on Friday March 30, 2018 @01:25AM (#16713885)
There is another way of looking at this. This executive is the only one being charged even though there were other executives with similar breaches. It appears that Equifax is allowing him to be charged to placate the public anger. Hence, the phrase "little guy takes the fall".
Re:Former Equifax Executive Charged with Insider Trading by ycombobreaker on Friday March 30, 2018 @02:31AM (#16714150)
> It appears that Equifax is allowing him to be charged

Why would Equifax even have a say in that? It's not like he's a sacrificial lamb. There's evidence against him, it will be used. If evidence is discovered against other individuals, it will be used, regardless of the opinion of Equifax.

Re:Former Equifax Executive Charged with Insider Trading by downrightmike on Thursday March 29, 2018 @10:57PM (#16713361)
*Scape goat
Re:Former Equifax Executive Charged with Insider Trading by JumpCrisscross on Thursday March 29, 2018 @11:04PM (#16713385)
> Scape goat*

"Scapegoating is the practice of singling out a person or group for unmerited blame" [1]. Ying's blame is merited. What happened here is multiple people may have violated securities law and one has been charged. We don't know yet if it's one period or one so far.

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scapegoating

Re:Former Equifax Executive Charged with Insider Trading by mcny on Thursday March 29, 2018 @10:51PM (#16713328)
It really is NOT. From what I've read prosecutors care a lot about their "success rate".

I think the consensus here is Equifax hired this guy to take the blame pretty much. That's why we call him the fall guy.

Look at Wells Fargo. Or even HSBC. Apparently, even Toyota tried to cover up its sticky accelerator? Don't forget about VW.

I think when something like this happens the CEO and the board must go to prison even if there is no direct evidence. You must take responsibility for the actions of your reports. I can't see things improving any other way.

Re:Former Equifax Executive Charged with Insider Trading by djrogers on Friday March 30, 2018 @12:11AM (#16713618)
> I think the consensus here is Equifax hired this guy to take the blame pretty much.

What are you on about? Your theory is that Equifax execs presciently knew there would be a breach, and that they’d want to engage in insider trading, so they hired this guy and waited until the breach then told him to break the law too so he could ‘take he fall’?