Re:61% of “Entry-Level” Jobs Require 3+ Years of Experience
by crimsonalucard on Wednesday March 28, 2018 @10:06PM
(#16704000)
Right, it's a thinking ahead investment scenario with risk. But if you look at it from a transactional point of view it makes no sense: I pay you to educate you while you provide me with nothing.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:61% of “Entry-Level” Jobs Require 3+ Years of Experience
by paulie_a on Wednesday March 28, 2018 @10:26PM
(#16704072)
If an employer is thinking with that mentality, why would I ever want to work for them?
Re:61% of “Entry-Level” Jobs Require 3+ Years of Experience
by crimsonalucard on Saturday March 31, 2018 @11:00AM
(#16723556)
A fair transaction rather than a risky investment? Let me ask you something. Would you work for an employer that will only maybe pay you after one year? Because that's essentially the payoff an employer gets when they decide to take on an entry level hire.
Think about it this way. Why would any employer hire you if you have that mentality?