News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:OpenBazaar 2.0, powered by IPFS by SamPatt on Wednesday March 28, 2018 @07:43PM (#16703156)
If the buyer leaves a review after making a purchase, that's effectively a small proof of work in and of itself, and you can only leave one review per purchase.

We haven't seen review bombing attempted yet, but if someone were willing to pay a bunch of fees then I suppose it is possible to do.

Re:OpenBazaar 2.0, powered by IPFS by IncRnd on Wednesday March 28, 2018 @10:58PM (#16704195)
In book publishing an author can purchase copies of their own books in order to increase purchases by others. This effect is actually common in many industries, even in mobile apps :)
Re:OpenBazaar 2.0, powered by IPFS by jcoffland on Thursday March 29, 2018 @04:27AM (#16705445)
So OpenBazaar's no worse than preexisting systems in this respect.
Re:OpenBazaar 2.0, powered by IPFS by hnarn on Thursday March 29, 2018 @05:58AM (#16705795)
It's also borderline an unsolvable problem, because how do you identify "legitimate" customers in an anonymous de-centralized system, when it's even too complicated to achieve in a centralized system?
Re:OpenBazaar 2.0, powered by IPFS by heavenlyblue on Friday March 30, 2018 @06:48AM (#16715086)
Assign a cost of creating a single anonymous identity: you've got to send xx amount of bitcoin to an unspendable address.
Re:OpenBazaar 2.0, powered by IPFS by jononor on Saturday March 31, 2018 @06:37PM (#16725538)
That is somewhat analogous to proof of stake, I guess?
Re:OpenBazaar 2.0, powered by IPFS by nedwin on Thursday March 29, 2018 @01:25AM (#16704688)
And definitely in the record industry