Re:Ask HN: Why nobody competes with Adobe?
by jimmiejams on Tuesday March 27, 2018 @11:56PM
(#16695140)
I used to work with a designer who lived and breathed CorelDraw. She could do everything she needed to in it, and preferred it over Photoshop. The rest of the designers used Photoshop and there was always some pressure for her to switch, but she was productive and that's all that really mattered. She used to have a few digs at them about how quick it was to do something (or even possible), but all in good fun.
Re:Ask HN: Why nobody competes with Adobe?
by kyriakos on Wednesday March 28, 2018 @12:49AM
(#16695362)
I still feel like curve editing, point selection on Corel Draw is more intuitive than Illustrator. Corel got a lot of things right but didn't manage to get its products seriously considered by the publishing industry.
Look at how Illustrator even today doesn't use shift-clicks consistently with either Mac or Windows; it works like an app from thirty years ago, because it is a 30-year-old app.
Artists learn a tool, and are more interested in what they can do with that tool than how the tool works. Thus, they have a uniquely poor ability to adapt. You can see that with the transition of film photographers to digital. Also 3D guys: I have a neighbor who was an animator in the eighties, he did a bunch of those animated logos for NBC and HBO and MTV (with physically carved models and fancy camera tricks); he's trying like hell to adapt to software, but he seems to be about a decade late to wrap his head around it.