News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Oracle Wins Revival of Billion-Dollar Case Against Google. Parent comment

Re:Oracle Wins Revival of Billion-Dollar Case Against Google by jgh on Tuesday March 27, 2018 @02:02PM (#16691111)
Does that mean all the cloud providers who are copying S3's API for object storage are violating some copyright?
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Oracle Wins Revival of Billion-Dollar Case Against Google by jrochkind1 on Tuesday March 27, 2018 @03:09PM (#16691773)
That is what the new law established by that case seems to suggest...
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Oracle Wins Revival of Billion-Dollar Case Against Google by izacus on Tuesday March 27, 2018 @02:31PM (#16691420)
I'm sure Amazon would love that to be true and force any competitor to beg for licensing.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Oracle Wins Revival of Billion-Dollar Case Against Google by curt15 on Tuesday March 27, 2018 @07:55PM (#16693899)
After all, the sole purpose of such reimplementations would be to take business away from Amazon.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Oracle Wins Revival of Billion-Dollar Case Against Google by jgh on Tuesday March 27, 2018 @09:27PM (#16694404)
what about things like aftermarket car parts? 3rd party phone cases?
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Oracle Wins Revival of Billion-Dollar Case Against Google by bonesss on Wednesday March 28, 2018 @04:08AM (#16696215)
Lego-peg compatible toys made by other producers?

Other forms of structured metadata use cross-party?

[ Parent | on HN ]