News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Oracle Wins Revival of Billion-Dollar Case Against Google by pjmlp on Tuesday March 27, 2018 @11:17AM (#16689294)
All telecommunication companies, Nokia, Motorola, Alcatel-Lucent, .... have their network elements APIs copyrighted and pattented.

Try to sell a device that comunicates with a e.g. BTS station without buying their licenses, to see how it ends.

Re:Oracle Wins Revival of Billion-Dollar Case Against Google by simias on Tuesday March 27, 2018 @11:57AM (#16689721)
In my experience the big hurdle is getting your device certified, not licensing issues. That's not really an IP issue however, it's just that uncertified devices might misbehave and create issues for other users.
Re:Oracle Wins Revival of Billion-Dollar Case Against Google by steve_gh on Tuesday March 27, 2018 @11:28AM (#16689415)
Mobile Telecoms standards are written by 3GPP, all BTSs and handsets (and for that matter, interfaces like 'A') are standard, and controlled by 3GPP. I believe they are open.
Re:Oracle Wins Revival of Billion-Dollar Case Against Google by pjmlp on Tuesday March 27, 2018 @11:57AM (#16689723)
Not they belong to the companies and some of them are available under FRAND licensing.

For the rest there is the 3GPP patent platform.

Re:Oracle Wins Revival of Billion-Dollar Case Against Google by kpil on Tuesday March 27, 2018 @12:41PM (#16690254)
I'd say it's patent law, not copyright law, that make the licences possible to enforce.

Most of the patents are the result of a lot of research and cleverness. Some of the patents are the equivalent of looking in another drawer if the first one did not contain what you are looking in.

It's a bit arbitrary that an API isn't protected when some bullshit patents are. There is clearly much thought in some of the java APIs.

I'd like to see shorter protection time for patents thought, especially in areas where there are very low investment costs, like software development.