News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Facebook has lost $100B in 10 days and now advertisers ar... by fossuser on Monday March 26, 2018 @07:38PM (#16683751)
All young people are on FB, they may additionally be on something else (probably Instagram which is also FB and starving out Snap) - the default remains Facebook.

I'd bet against you. The trajectory is fine and Zuckerberg is a good CEO. They have nearly a third of the earth as users and a ridiculously high percentage of internet users.

Given a long enough time horizon any company is vulnerable, but FB is here to stay for a long while.

Re:Facebook has lost $100B in 10 days and now advertisers ar... by varrock on Monday March 26, 2018 @11:51PM (#16685074)
I've always attributed Facebook's success with older generations to the feeling you get when somebody you're talking to brings up a name you hadn't heard in numerous years, and here's why.

Let's first think about the demographic that has kept Facebook afloat; Baby Boomers and Generation X. When you think about most of these individuals, they graduated high school and college without much there to remind them of individuals they were acquainted with, minus maybe their yearbooks from high school. Sure, most probably wrote or emailed their close friends, but we're talking about those afterthought individuals that they came into contact with under specific circumstances that generated that "acquaintance" classification. Then, all of a sudden, appears Facebook, a platform that allows these individuals to link their name with their school. It's a database at their fingertips with all of their classmates with up-to-date pictures, life stories, and mutual friends to explore. Facebook is that one "person" I referenced earlier; the person that brings up that name you hadn't thought about for years, except now you can actually explore what they are up to, and Facebook continuously reminds people of those afterthought names.

The question is, how long is this effect going to sustain Facebook's competitive advantage? Like people have mentioned, there was Whitepages, now there is Facebook, but what's next?

Re:Facebook has lost $100B in 10 days and now advertisers ar... by Johnny555 on Tuesday March 27, 2018 @03:32AM (#16686168)
All young people are on FB

Are they? My young teenaged (age 13-17) nieces/nephews have no FB presence at all. Their older siblings were on FB all the time at that age and still have FB pages, but are no longer very active - they mainly use FB to comment on their parents and other relatives pages.

While this is purely anecdotal, FB does seem to be losing young users:

https://www.inc.com/zoe-henry/facebook-losing-users-faster-t...

If they are going to Instagram, then FB isn't really losing them, if they are going elsewhere, then it doesn't bode well for FB.

Re:Facebook has lost $100B in 10 days and now advertisers ar... by tenpies on Monday March 26, 2018 @08:49PM (#16684175)
With time, Facebook is becoming the white pages[1]. Sure, people have profiles there, but just like the white pages, it's entirely passive and something that's there because you forgot to opt out. That publication barely exists now, but there was a time when it was the place to advertise.

---

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Telephone_directory

Re:Facebook has lost $100B in 10 days and now advertisers ar... by brrrrr on Monday March 26, 2018 @08:59PM (#16684223)
Having one third of the earth’s population touch your site at least once won’t matter if you do nothing particularly useful.

Facebook does almost nothing useful. It’s kind irritating to actually try to do anything with the user interface, since everything is slippery funnels.

Whatever isn’t an inductive dark pattern is otherwise emotional blackmail. The options and settings provided to the user don’t make sense, and are all defaulted to the worst choices imaginable.

Re:Facebook has lost $100B in 10 days and now advertisers ar... by Retric on Monday March 26, 2018 @07:42PM (#16683790)
Logging in once a year is meaningless from a network effect standpoint. They might have an account and even use it to talk with grandparents, but without daily use FB has little pull.
Re:Facebook has lost $100B in 10 days and now advertisers ar... by fossuser on Monday March 26, 2018 @07:48PM (#16683815)
They have over two billion monthly active users - not sure the DAU stat, but hundreds of millions would not surprise me.
Re:Facebook has lost $100B in 10 days and now advertisers ar... by MarkMc on Tuesday March 27, 2018 @01:46AM (#16685624)
Not sure why you were downvoted. Their daily user count is 1.4 billion: https://www.statista.com/statistics/346167/facebook-global-d...
Re:Facebook has lost $100B in 10 days and now advertisers ar... by fossuser on Tuesday March 27, 2018 @10:26AM (#16688680)
I think I was downvoted because this has become some sort of tribal identity issue.
Re:Facebook has lost $100B in 10 days and now advertisers ar... by is_true on Monday March 26, 2018 @09:05PM (#16684256)
The young people I know is now on Snapchat or Instagram. Fb is now the place for adult people.

WhatsApp doesn't have this problem. It's hard to monetize with ads but it's a data goldmine.