The media decisions on "what shows up in the news" is well known, but under-reported (for obvious reasons). Whatever shows up in the news is meant to increase the value of these 6 companies (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Media_cross-ownership_in_the_U...) and advance their CEO/boards personal agendas for the United States and world.
If you take what shows up in standard media's headlines as "what's worth talking about" you are playing their game.
It’s almost like there’s a “trending news” sidebar that these shadowy people added and put in whatever they feel like and whoops we’re talking about Facebook again aren’t we?
All the viral trends can be traced back to one-two sources which got picked by influential media, everybody else is talking about it because others do the same. The media always worked that way, it's nothing new, it's just more apparent in the age of hyperconnectivity.
Media started feeding us stories how social networks are "bad for you", then slowly ramped up to give us the "piece de resistance": your soul (your data) has been sold to the devil.
Come on, isn't anyone else seeing it?!
ps: we have been programmed to believe this is not happening so i won't be surprised if this gets down-voted by the sheeple...
ps#2: it might not be a group or organization but just the result of a poorly built internet eco-system.