News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Cutting ‘Old Heads’ at IBM by tzs on Thursday March 22, 2018 @11:55AM (#16649680)
It took a couple of minutes with Google and the phrase "binding arbitration in $X" for $X in {Canada, Japan, France} to determine that this is not accurate.

Are you sure you aren't mixing up binding arbitration with something else?

Edit: it sounded like you were talking about arbitration in a more general context than just employment contracts. If you are just talking about employment contracts than you are probably right (except possible for Canada, where there seems to be case law going both ways, so it seems to depend on the particulars of what is in dispute and how the contract is written).

Re:Cutting ‘Old Heads’ at IBM by Spoom on Thursday March 22, 2018 @12:13PM (#16649905)
I think GP meant forced binding arbitration, where you can permanently sign away your right to sue in advance of an actual dispute. I believe this is a fairly unique issue to the US. Or are you stating that you can do the same in e.g. Canada?
Re:Cutting ‘Old Heads’ at IBM by walshemj on Thursday March 22, 2018 @07:11PM (#16653585)
Id agree in the UK its common to settle out of court (well employment tribunal) and employers must pay for your selected lawyer to check the "compromise agreement"

Your employer cant say ah you must use my mate Saul the solicitor that did my last house purchase who I know from the golf club.

Re:Cutting ‘Old Heads’ at IBM by toyg on Thursday March 22, 2018 @11:58AM (#16649720)
Uhm, are you sure? https://www.americanbar.org/content/dam/aba/events/labor_law...

"In France, as a general rule, arbitration concerning individual employment contracts is prohibited. This holds true even in cases where the parties have included an arbitration agreement and a valid choice of law clause designating that foreign law applies to the entirety of the employment contract. Such a strict interpretation is seen as a public policy measure intended to protect employees who are considered to be in a necessarily weaker bargaining position compared to their employers. By giving Labor Courts the unique competency to adjudicate such matters, France can effectively safeguard its workforce.

Similar interests motivate protective regulatory schemes in most European Union (EU) nations where, as we will discuss, the prevalence of arbitration in labor and employment disputes remains limited and political weariness towards the practice pervades. "

Re:Cutting ‘Old Heads’ at IBM by tzs on Thursday March 22, 2018 @12:33PM (#16650177)
It wasn't clear if he was specifically referring to employment arbitration or binding arbitration in general.