Re:Why I Don't Sign Non-Competes
by crusso on Wednesday March 21, 2018 @09:52AM
(#16637962)
Kind of an interesting approach to it, I guess. I wonder how far you could take such a thing.
I'm wondering where the legal line is between the employer's need to do due diligence and the expectation that the employee isn't doing something to trick the employer into thinking that everyone agrees to the employment arrangement.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Sounds like this [1] case where a man received a credit card offer in the mail, re-wrote some terms and sent it back, and the bank accepted it without reading it. He did win the initial lawsuit from the bank.
[1] https://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/personalfinance/borrowin...
I really respect that guy. From the linked article:
"They signed the documents without looking. They said what usually their borrowers say in court: 'We have not read it',” said Mr Mikhalevich.
I am always pissed off at the stuff that companies get away with, just because they often have a dedicated team of lawyers and a big budget for this stuff. Oleg Tinkov, founder of the bank, tweeted: "Our lawyers think he is going to get not 24m, but really 4 years in prison for fraud. Now it's a matter of principle for @tcsbanktwitter."
Typical scare tactics, seems like they were trying to scare him into a settlement.
Re:Why I Don't Sign Non-Competes
by jermaustin1 on Wednesday March 21, 2018 @10:51AM
(#16638462)
He technically won a consolation prize (30% cash back debit card) on his counter suit after both parties withdrew their suits[1].
[1]https://themoscowtimes.com/articles/man-who-outwitted-bank-e...