News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on JDK 10: General Availability. Parent comment

Re:JDK 10: General Availability by yaseenk on Wednesday March 21, 2018 @09:29AM (#16637806)
Java is backwards compatible though. Code that was written in the 90s will still compile and run on JDK 10.

It’s just now Java gets to iterate and improve more frequently and regularly.

Regardless there are still LTS releases (every 3 years) for people who lean more conservative.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:JDK 10: General Availability by evgeniysharapov on Wednesday March 21, 2018 @09:50AM (#16637938)
Not always and not quite. Here's an example of some type-foo with generics that works on Java 7 and not on Java 8

https://stackoverflow.com/questions/34659055/java-8-incompat...

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:JDK 10: General Availability by hyperpape on Wednesday March 21, 2018 @11:12AM (#16638682)
If I read that correctly, the “breakage” is a bug fix, as that particular Java 7 compiler isn’t behaving according to the spec. You can argue that breaks backwards compatibility, but in the smallest, most innocuous way possible.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:JDK 10: General Availability by kelnos on Wednesday March 21, 2018 @12:43PM (#16639832)
My understanding after reading the answer to that SO question is that the behavior in 7 was a bug. New releases of javac aren't required to be bug-compatible with previous releases.
[ Parent | on HN ]