Re:Hackers 'led warplanes to Syrian hospital' after targetin...
by fdsak on Wednesday March 21, 2018 @07:09AM
(#16636999)
Murdering ex-spies on the streets of Salisbury with chemical weapons certainly seems like the appropriate response, yes.
Its not appropriate response, that is way everyone is skeptical. Why use a missile when you can kill the bird with a slingshot ?
Re:Hackers 'led warplanes to Syrian hospital' after targetin...
by EliRivers on Wednesday March 21, 2018 @07:14AM
(#16637018)
Its not appropriate response, that is way everyone is skeptical.
Ah, I see. You're derailing the conversation. You've tried to change it to "because murdering an ex-spy with a chemical weapon on the streets of Salisbury is not an appropriate response to the West's actions in the middle east, it can't have been Russia who did it."
You've been rumbled. Jog on.
Re:Hackers 'led warplanes to Syrian hospital' after targetin...
by fdsak on Wednesday March 21, 2018 @07:27AM
(#16637064)
You've been rumbled. Jog on
My argument was two pronged.
1) UK lied in several cases or most of the cases and now UK==lier so Once a lier always a lier
2) Its not me or Russian who rumbled , but instead it is and it was West( France in case of Libya, UK in case of Iraq, US in case of Syria) has be rumbled.
Murdering ex-spies on the streets of Salisbury with chemical weapons certainly seems like the appropriate response, yes. Although interesting to see that it was the Swedes who did it, according to the Russian Foreign Ministry.
It's an interesting double-game they play; Russia needs people to know it was them, but they also need to be able to deny it.