News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Sci-Bay: Google Scholar plus Sci-Hub by zaarn on Wednesday March 21, 2018 @05:44AM (#16636642)
In short Elsevier.

The movie industry has it's fair share of copyright protectionism (DRM is popular) and same goes for gaming.

Elsevier is worse. They get paid by scientists so they publish their papers. They get paid massive amounts of money by universities (sometimes even the same that paid the scientist) to be granted access to research. Research largely funded by tax money. Research results that had already been paid for to even be published there.

There is a very good article in the SlateStarCodex if you're interested in a more in-depth article on it.

Re:Sci-Bay: Google Scholar plus Sci-Hub by paulhilbert on Wednesday March 21, 2018 @07:38AM (#16637127)
I read this quite often and frankly do not understand it. How is Elsevier worse than ACM, IEEE or Springer? I found them to be equally intolerable but still Elsevier gets routinely picked as the prime example...
Re:Sci-Bay: Google Scholar plus Sci-Hub by crtasm on Wednesday March 21, 2018 @01:46PM (#16640580)
Elsevier are disliked for litigation against scihub+libgen, IIRC? Also might be noteworthy that they have a long controversies section on their wikipedia page (including lots of things I'd never read about until now) while Springer and IEEE have none listed.

I couldn't find ACM, what does it stand for?

Re:Sci-Bay: Google Scholar plus Sci-Hub by neurocline on Wednesday March 21, 2018 @06:42PM (#16643108)
Association for Computing Machinery. Theoretically everyone in the computer science field is not just aware of them but is a member :)
Re:Sci-Bay: Google Scholar plus Sci-Hub by paulhilbert on Thursday March 22, 2018 @09:45AM (#16648565)
Yes. I work in CS in the field of Computer Graphics and (by association) Computer Vision and Robotics. Our top conferences and journals are by ACM. However there are a few journals by Elsevier and IEEE which are relevant. I do not have (legal) access to any of those three. However there are publishers who allow authors private/institutional hosting of their papers without paying additional open access fees. I would still doubt their legitimacy in tax funded research results...