Self-driving Uber car kills Arizona woman crossing street

Re:Self-driving Uber car kills Arizona woman crossing street by em3rgent0rdr on Monday March 19, 2018 @06:29PM (#16623884)

> "Every crash and especially fatality can be thoroughly investigated"

Would be better if the code and data was open for public review.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Self-driving Uber car kills Arizona woman crossing street by jryle70 on Tuesday March 20, 2018 @12:35AM (#16626091)

That's knee-jerk reaction that may open a can of worm. Do you need personal details of the victim as well as the driver? Says if the victim had attempted suicide before? at the same crossroad? Or the driver had history of depression? Would that be a violation of their privacy? Would that cause a witch hunt?

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Self-driving Uber car kills Arizona woman crossing street by ric2b on Tuesday March 20, 2018 @06:42AM (#16627329)

Code and data, not people's personal details.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Self-driving Uber car kills Arizona woman crossing street by jryle70 on Tuesday March 20, 2018 @08:03AM (#16627753)

Sure. But if the result is inconclusive, do you leave it at that or demand to know more? What exactly does making the data public better than entrusting a competent organization such as NTSB?

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Self-driving Uber car kills Arizona woman crossing street by ric2b on Monday April 02, 2018 @06:28AM (#16733505)

Yes, you leave it at that, why would personal details be relevant?

Making it public means more eyes on the data, which can lead to a better understanding of what went wrong.

[ Parent | on HN ]