jryle70
jryle70 on Hacker News
Skepticism about shipping date is normal, especially for something novel and hard. Calling people fraud without evidence is just bad.
Are you saying you've never texted happy birthday to anyone? or people doing so should be ashamed? or it's ok to type the message on the phone but not saying it?
Good idea. Maybe focus on posts that stay on the topic.
That isn't true. The court only upholds the laws. Who make the laws?
What is purely fact? If instead of "Pure drinking from the nature", vendors market their products with one of these:
- Pure hydration, straight from the heart of pristine nature
- Crisp, untouched refreshment in every drop
- Silky refreshment straight from the source
- Clean, effortless hydration as nature intended
- Unfiltered clarity from mountain to bottle
- Naturally balanced, untouched by process
- Purity preserved from subterranean springs
Can you say they aren't purely fact? How do you prove it? Can you deny that marketing?
(I of course asked LLM for those alternatives)
Were they not right? Just like money giving you some runway but will run out, the exposure is still only a leveler, it's still up to you to take advantage of it.
Also, they were not OpenAI.
OpenAI acknowledging and fixing the bug is worth millions
Yes, fight! you may win in the end. Who knows, right?
False positive? How did you know?
As mentioned in TFA's title: "Rhode Island company transforms a 1960s Russian flier with modern technology"
Because it's interesting?
People avoid voice conversation because they don't want to deal with human live interaction. Most people don't mind talking to themselves, as sad as it sounds. I'm guilty as well.
As someone who needs glasses to use computer, it's really convenient to be able to use voice for interaction, also while driving or at home in the kitchen. I'm waiting for good smart glasses as well, since I don't want to have to keep taking my glasses out just to check any piece of information -- menu, price tag, train time, and so on.
> I think if you go far enough into the past, the "jobs" were fun and enjoyable
Which jobs specifically were fun and enjoyable and during which period? What is the evidence for that?
Automate forklift? like a conveyor?
Successful businesses understand keeping employees happy is also good for business. It isn't either-or.
> Peolpe work not to fill their otherwise empty existence, but in order to earn money
Unless they are desperate, they'd still prefer less dull jobs. Desperate employees are disaster in the waiting.
> Dullness could be solved by making the tasks less dull
That's the recipe for unsafe working environments.
You've been here long enough, I'm sure you could remember all of the posts complaining about the quality of coding bootcamps, that it was too easy for outsiders to learn software development. Is that your idea of gatekeeping?
> When Number of Jobs automated approaches 100% then what?
When was that? Or hypothetical? Why would that be and not that new jobs being created?
I personally think video games / fashion / entertainment have much higher societal / environmental concern than AI. But it isn't for me to judge. You and many other people enjoy them. I'm in the minority. So are you or am I right?
> actually we still don't want those shit datacenters, this wreckless scraping
Those are used by the useless things I mentioned above. I don't think you're showing the same outrage.
Did you buy from China? How were the workers who made those items treated? How did you get those items to where you live? Do you know how much pollution that would cause? (I do buy them, btw, I have no moral superiority).
Did you travel? Think about the cost it causes to society. Again, I love travel.
I don't have problems with you criticizing AI or your favorite targets of the day. I do have issues with fake morality, lacking of self reflection.
Weren't you hesitant downloading apps pre-LLM? If you were, what is the difference?
How do you know it wouldn't scale?
> For some it's also a vanity thing, where entrepreneur or startup sounds better.
That's your projection
Why? if he's selling his labor, then it's self employed. Selling a product, that's a proper business.
Explain what you mean by not being able to get to Mars?
Huh? new tech companies have proliferated in the US the last few years. M&A is just one side of the coin. Without an exit path -- IPO, acquisition or private credits -- there is very little appetite for new businesses.
Did you know that 151 companies were founded by SpaceX's alumni? Compare to 5 they've acquired (not including XAI)
https://www.alumnifounders.com/stats
> when you know your creation will be buried underneath 20 other low quality versions
So you want to show off instead of doing it for yourself? find something harder to show off then.
I can hardly run 5km, but I was still immensely proud of myself whenever I did. It still brings me great joy even though I'm a mediocre runner at best.
Different people have different feeling and motivation and reasons for doing things. No doubt there are people thinking like you, but it's to early to tell how it will be for the majority.
> People still play chess and go and StarCraft
Because most people still find them enjoyable. You can't say those are less enjoyable than math. There is no universal scale for enjoyment.
> kind of like you might eat today even though you already ate yesterday
You'd die if you stop eating after yesterday's meals. That's survival.
We don't. Just like how we know if smcg is from a competitor attempting to create FUD?
It works in mysterious ways, but you know exactly it will behave certain way "Because of the vibes, and investors are indeed all about the vibes."?
I bet you that for every bad history event, I can cite at least one good outcome of advance in science and technology.
Bad thing can certainly happen. In fact it'll likely happen. Still, good things too, equally likely. In your words, "good AI" can be used to prevent "bad AI".
Nobody knows the extent of the impact. Who says otherwise is foolish.
Not the same thing because there is no "actual value". You should claim that invention.