News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Surprising Creativity: Anecdotes from Evolutionary Comput... by sago on Friday March 16, 2018 @12:30PM (#16601730)
That is one kind of problem. The 'Genie' problem: be very specific what you wish for because the genie will misinterpret you.

But it's not the only kind of problem. There are inherent biases in evolutionary systems. One example: in systems with varying length genotypes there is a massive pressure to bloat. Even if you encode 'small' as a strong requirement in your fitness function, it may not be enough (or it may be enough to completely defeat whatever your real goal was).

There are inherent biases. In the (simulated) genetics, in the genotype to phenotype mapping, in the evolutionary operators, even if you get the fitness function right.

Evolutionary computing as an engineering tool is hard.

Re:Surprising Creativity: Anecdotes from Evolutionary Comput... by fallous on Friday March 16, 2018 @01:31PM (#16602324)
Just picking a nit, but the problem with a genie isn't that it misinterprets you but that it literally does exactly what you ask for. The mismatch between "what you wanted" and "what you asked for" isn't the genie's fault but yours.
Re:Surprising Creativity: Anecdotes from Evolutionary Comput... by todd8 on Friday March 16, 2018 @02:00PM (#16602605)
Yes, the genie gives you exactly what you ask for but misinterpretes what you wish for.
Re:Surprising Creativity: Anecdotes from Evolutionary Comput... by tabtab on Friday March 16, 2018 @05:33PM (#16604195)
Re: "The 'Genie' problem: be very specific what you wish for because the genie will misinterpret you."

My first wish is to beta-test my next 2 wishes.