Re:Security Researchers Publish Ryzen Flaws, Gave AMD 24 Hou...
by tptacek on Tuesday March 13, 2018 @07:27PM
(#16580827)
Then you were wrong, since those attacks against unpatched, unhardened hosts are trivially weaponizable through browser Javascript.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Security Researchers Publish Ryzen Flaws, Gave AMD 24 Hou...
by guelo on Tuesday March 13, 2018 @09:28PM
(#16581506)
They're weaponizable when using a small and rapidly shrinking percentage of unpatched browsers running JavaScript delivered by extremely uncommon websites.
Re:Security Researchers Publish Ryzen Flaws, Gave AMD 24 Hou...
by tptacek on Tuesday March 13, 2018 @09:36PM
(#16581542)
That's true because the vulnerability itself wasn't overblown, and was immediately patched.
Re:Security Researchers Publish Ryzen Flaws, Gave AMD 24 Hou...
by yuhong on Tuesday March 13, 2018 @09:58PM
(#16581651)
I am particularly talking about things like Intel's stock price though
Re:Security Researchers Publish Ryzen Flaws, Gave AMD 24 Hou...
by tptacek on Tuesday March 13, 2018 @10:32PM
(#16581831)
Oh. Sure, I buy that. I don't believe patchable vulnerabilities really exert major pressure on stock prices.
Re:Security Researchers Publish Ryzen Flaws, Gave AMD 24 Hou...
by Buge on Wednesday March 14, 2018 @04:17AM
(#16583151)
>JavaScript delivered by extremely uncommon websites
All it takes it emailing them a slightly convincing link, and they're running javascript from one of those "extremely uncommon websites". It doesn't matter how common the website it, a single website can compromise millions of users.
Re:Security Researchers Publish Ryzen Flaws, Gave AMD 24 Hou...
by api on Tuesday March 13, 2018 @11:36PM
(#16582075)
Attacks only get better.
Re:Security Researchers Publish Ryzen Flaws, Gave AMD 24 Hou...
by Lerc on Tuesday March 13, 2018 @07:33PM
(#16580860)
Can you point to a javascript example?
I can think of a number of approaches, but nothing I could catergorise as trivial.
Re:Security Researchers Publish Ryzen Flaws, Gave AMD 24 Hou...
by grub5000 on Tuesday March 13, 2018 @07:50PM
(#16580981)
First hit for googling "Spectre Javascript POC": https://github.com/ascendr/spectre-chrome
Re:Security Researchers Publish Ryzen Flaws, Gave AMD 24 Hou...
by therein on Tuesday March 13, 2018 @08:06PM
(#16581074)
> Enable `#shared-array-buffer` in `chrome:///flags` under your own risk...
Re:Security Researchers Publish Ryzen Flaws, Gave AMD 24 Hou...
by tptacek on Tuesday March 13, 2018 @08:09PM
(#16581092)
SharedArrayBuffer was disabled exactly because vulnerabilities like this are easily exploitable (but there are POCs that don't depend on it).
Re:Security Researchers Publish Ryzen Flaws, Gave AMD 24 Hou...
by ComputerGuru on Tuesday March 13, 2018 @08:57PM
(#16581372)
It was only disabled as a mitigation to these specific attacks, in case you though it was an experimental or “at your own risk” type of thing.
Re:Security Researchers Publish Ryzen Flaws, Gave AMD 24 Hou...
by daira on Wednesday March 14, 2018 @04:09AM
(#16583126)
Disabling SharedArrayBuffer is just stopping the most obvious method of exploitation; it's by no means a fix. Expect a slew of papers over the next few years on other methods of exploitation from JS.