Re:Dropbox Chief to Join Elite Ranks of Idea-to-I.P.O. Founders
by mrep on Sunday March 11, 2018 @11:58AM
(#16563437)
> There's good reason. Fraternities are the exact opposite of meritocracy. Their very reason for existence, in fact, is to subvert meritocracy through cronyism and nepotism for those who can afford it.
There may be some like that but there are plenty that are not. I don't remember anyone getting in my fraternity that way and we averaged over 100 members at a time.
Re:Dropbox Chief to Join Elite Ranks of Idea-to-I.P.O. Founders
by barrkel on Sunday March 11, 2018 @11:44AM
(#16563385)
Being sociable and cultivating social connections is also a skill, and a marketplace where supply and demand need to be matched up but aren't necessarily able to articulate or quantify their offers, it's one of the most valuable skills you can have.
Re:Dropbox Chief to Join Elite Ranks of Idea-to-I.P.O. Founders
by defen on Sunday March 11, 2018 @12:33PM
(#16563608)
> Because of this, people engaged in strictly meritocratic work (science and engineering) find that whole world repulsive.
Richard Feynman, John Bardeen, Linus Pauling, and Kary Mullis were all in frats. That's just from 5 minutes of googling famous American scientists I could think of, I'm sure there's more.
Re:Dropbox Chief to Join Elite Ranks of Idea-to-I.P.O. Founders
by zawerf on Sunday March 11, 2018 @02:43PM
(#16564197)
Using Feynman as an example doesn't help your case:
https://restructure.wordpress.com/2009/08/07/sexist-feynman-...
That said, I don't think we can judge people in the past using modern ethical values and it doesn't take away from his achievements.
Re:Dropbox Chief to Join Elite Ranks of Idea-to-I.P.O. Founders
by defen on Sunday March 11, 2018 @03:13PM
(#16564312)
The argument was "engineers/scientists find fraternities repulsive". Arguing that a top scientist was a jerk/misogynist/racist/sexist/whatever doesn't refute that.
Re:Dropbox Chief to Join Elite Ranks of Idea-to-I.P.O. Founders
by sidlls on Sunday March 11, 2018 @11:59AM
(#16563445)
Science and engineering aren't strictly meritocratic by any means. More than the fraternity system, perhaps, but not strictly.
Re:Dropbox Chief to Join Elite Ranks of Idea-to-I.P.O. Founders
by gaius on Sunday March 11, 2018 @01:16PM
(#16563796)
Right; ask the average person to name a frat and they will think of Skull & Bones at Yale.
Re:Dropbox Chief to Join Elite Ranks of Idea-to-I.P.O. Founders
by ghaff on Sunday March 11, 2018 @01:49PM
(#16563964)
That's actually not a frat. It's a "secret society." Related but not the same thing.
Re:Dropbox Chief to Join Elite Ranks of Idea-to-I.P.O. Founders
by olivermarks on Sunday March 11, 2018 @02:12PM
(#16564067)
What's the difference between a fraternity and secret society? One is more exclusive and secretive?
Re:Dropbox Chief to Join Elite Ranks of Idea-to-I.P.O. Founders
by ghaff on Sunday March 11, 2018 @02:18PM
(#16564092)
It varies a lot. Yes, secret societies tend to be more secretive. In some cases, though not Skull & Bones, membership is secret. And they generally don't have public parties as tends to be the case with fraternities. At least some members also generally live in fraternity houses while that's generally not the case with secret societies. That said, there are lots of variants of both as well as honor societies, eating clubs, etc.
There's good reason. Fraternities are the exact opposite of meritocracy. Their very reason for existence, in fact, is to subvert meritocracy through cronyism and nepotism for those who can afford it. Because of this, people engaged in strictly meritocratic work (science and engineering) find that whole world repulsive.