News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Nuclear fusion on brink of being realised, say MIT scient... by saiya-jin on Friday March 09, 2018 @04:44AM (#16550723)
which renewables are truly clean? Wind turbines require so much material and energy to manufacture that they will compensate this only over their whole lifetime. No clue about solar panels.

China is building tons of new coal plants to cover its current needs. It doesn't seem that renewables are that great, when not subsidized (which is the only true measure of effectivity)

Re:Nuclear fusion on brink of being realised, say MIT scient... by tim333 on Friday March 09, 2018 @09:28AM (#16551926)
I think your numbers may be off for wind turbines. Random googling gives

>for an offshore wind turbine 0.57 years of expected average energy production are necessary to recover all the energy consumed for manufacturing, operation, transport, dismantling and disposal https://www.wind-energy-the-facts.org/energy-balance-analysi...

Re:Nuclear fusion on brink of being realised, say MIT scient... by alex_duf on Friday March 09, 2018 @05:30AM (#16550916)
>China is building tons of new coal plants to cover its current needs

Not so sure about this one: https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2017/mar/22/coal-pow...

Sure they are still building but at a rate that has been drastically shaken up by both the price of renewables and their own environmental policies.

Now regarding the environmental impact of producing solar panels and wind turbines, they clearly are carbon negatives

http://www.drawdown.org/solutions/electricity-generation/roo...

http://www.drawdown.org/solutions/electricity-generation/win...

Though I'm sure they can't have no-impact, you will get some other form of pollution, but at the moment what matters most if reducing our greenhouse effect. It's cheap, it's already there so there's no reason to delay it I think.

Re:Nuclear fusion on brink of being realised, say MIT scient... by incompatible on Friday March 09, 2018 @05:01AM (#16550809)