News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Show HN: Tinder Revenue Estimate by mi100hael on Thursday March 08, 2018 @11:48AM (#16545553)
Feedback: consider ditching the .00 on the numbers and spelling out "million"/"billion." It's a lot easier to quickly read "$36.2 million" than "$36,200,000.00"
Re:Show HN: Tinder Revenue Estimate by ssdd on Thursday March 08, 2018 @01:17PM (#16546333)
At least numbers looks humongous at first glance with it. :)
Re:Show HN: Tinder Revenue Estimate by pc86 on Thursday March 08, 2018 @02:21PM (#16546851)
Go the federal budget route, round down until you get to "in thousands" or "in millions" for everything. Then it's still easy to compare $12 to $36,000 at a glance without staring at a table full of 000,000.00 :)
Re:Show HN: Tinder Revenue Estimate by jamez1 on Thursday March 08, 2018 @04:31PM (#16547796)
It's about information entropy, you want to maximize the information each character has. using 1000 digits to show what you could in 500 and a header saying "(in thousands)" maximizes the entropy
Re:Show HN: Tinder Revenue Estimate by atticusberg on Thursday March 08, 2018 @01:27PM (#16546406)
Or better yet, $36.2M
Re:Show HN: Tinder Revenue Estimate by subdane on Thursday March 08, 2018 @02:08PM (#16546741)
Here's one I always wonder about:

$36.2M; $36.2m; $36.2mm; ?

Re:Show HN: Tinder Revenue Estimate by lotsofpulp on Thursday March 08, 2018 @02:11PM (#16546764)
K, M, B, T, Q

thousand, million, billion, trillion, quadrillion. I'm not a fan of M and MM and MMM, it's much easier to use one letter that is different from the others.

Re:Show HN: Tinder Revenue Estimate by troels on Thursday March 08, 2018 @02:41PM (#16547018)
Well. A Billion is ambiguous. In many countries, it's called a Milliard. See: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Long_and_short_scales
Re:Show HN: Tinder Revenue Estimate by mandelbrotwurst on Thursday March 08, 2018 @03:19PM (#16547306)
I don't think the fact that there are multiple words that represent the same thing means that one is ambiguous. A "billion" is always 10^9, so it's not ambiguous, no?
Re:Show HN: Tinder Revenue Estimate by waits on Thursday March 08, 2018 @03:24PM (#16547336)
A "billion" is 10^9 in the short scale and 10^12 in the long scale.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Long_and_short_scales#Comparis...

Re:Show HN: Tinder Revenue Estimate by spiznnx on Thursday March 08, 2018 @04:06PM (#16547626)
It looks like the Long scale is falling into disuse in English speaking contexts from that article. I don't ever think I've ever seen the word "billion" in English refer to 1e+12 .
Re:Show HN: Tinder Revenue Estimate by troels on Thursday March 08, 2018 @05:38PM (#16548340)
No, it's the other way around. A billion means one thing in english speaking countries and another in most of the rest of the world. For a frenchman, it's indeed ambiguous -- there, a billion (english) would be a milliard (french), whereas a billion (french) would be a trillion in english. I imagine that is the reason why it's not seen as an abbreviation, in contexts where you want to be accurate.
Re:Show HN: Tinder Revenue Estimate by esalazar on Thursday March 08, 2018 @02:37PM (#16546986)
I think MM is the common way to denote million in finance.

I believe it comes from one thousand (roman numeral M) thousands (roman numeral M) or MM.

Re:Show HN: Tinder Revenue Estimate by rsp1984 on Thursday March 08, 2018 @02:32PM (#16546946)
Can't upvote this enough. I get the urge to just stop reading whenever I come across "MM". Just use "m" or "M" for millions, for heaven's sake.
Re:Show HN: Tinder Revenue Estimate by mi100hael on Thursday March 08, 2018 @02:57PM (#16547147)
It's a finance thing. M = roman numeral for 1,000.
Re:Show HN: Tinder Revenue Estimate by darwhy on Thursday March 08, 2018 @02:52PM (#16547101)
Will i18n ever know peace?
Re:Show HN: Tinder Revenue Estimate by drenvuk on Thursday March 08, 2018 @01:40PM (#16546528)
I think this depends on the individual. I always prefer the version with commas instead of words. It's easier to copy and paste for one.
Re:Show HN: Tinder Revenue Estimate by thisisit on Thursday March 08, 2018 @12:05PM (#16545722)
Agreed. For sometime I was scratching my head trying to understand the exact figures. The standard format is "in thousands".
Re:Show HN: Tinder Revenue Estimate by ThrustVectoring on Thursday March 08, 2018 @02:47PM (#16547069)
Also, right-aligning numbers that readers want to compare is generally a good idea.
Re:Show HN: Tinder Revenue Estimate by gupir on Thursday March 08, 2018 @04:38PM (#16547847)
I agree to drop the ".00", but I prefer the number $36,200,000.
Re:Show HN: Tinder Revenue Estimate by amelius on Thursday March 08, 2018 @05:19PM (#16548230)
Make it configurable!
Re:Show HN: Tinder Revenue Estimate by ebellity on Thursday March 08, 2018 @12:03PM (#16545700)
Right, thanks