Re:Google Engineers Think This 72-Qubit Processor Can Achiev...
by mikro2nd on Thursday March 08, 2018 @11:09AM
(#16545202)
I'll believe it when I see Satoshi's Bticoins draining off to a new wallet...
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Google Engineers Think This 72-Qubit Processor Can Achiev...
by Zaak on Thursday March 08, 2018 @11:16AM
(#16545261)
That would be fun to watch, but to be overly pedantic about it, it will take a computer with hundreds of qubits to break current public key encryption.
Re:Google Engineers Think This 72-Qubit Processor Can Achiev...
by vtomole on Thursday March 08, 2018 @11:40AM
(#16545490)
It will take hundreds of fault tolerant qubits. That means it will take potentially millions of physical qubits of relatively high quality. There is a long road ahead from 72 relatively medium quality to millions of relatively high quality qubits.
Re:Google Engineers Think This 72-Qubit Processor Can Achiev...
by ByThyGrace on Thursday March 08, 2018 @12:28PM
(#16545941)
As a layman, I've never heard of qubit quality. What is it exactly? How do you determine it? And why does it affect computation?
Re:Google Engineers Think This 72-Qubit Processor Can Achiev...
by vtomole on Thursday March 08, 2018 @01:33PM
(#16546457)
Qubit quality is defined by the quantum volume [0]. Errors that occur when gates are applied to qubits need to be below a certain threshold to perform error correction.
[0]: https://www.research.ibm.com/ibm-q/resources/quantum-volume....
Re:Google Engineers Think This 72-Qubit Processor Can Achiev...
by Zaak on Friday March 09, 2018 @11:21AM
(#16552786)
Is quantum error correction really that demanding? I thought it was only a small multiple of the number of qubits, not orders of magnitude more.