Peter Thiel’s Money Talks, in Contentious Ways. But What Does He Say?

Re:Peter Thiel’s Money Talks, in Contentious Ways. But What ... by wand3r on Wednesday March 07, 2018 @03:18PM (#16539444)

to be fair your opinion is less scientifically rigorous than the actual scientific papers he cited which was his formulation of data less than opinion. You can disagree with him & those papers but I do think a blanket dismissal of him as a person is difficult to infer from a single inter-office memo

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Peter Thiel’s Money Talks, in Contentious Ways. But What ... by keo92znx on Wednesday March 07, 2018 @03:29PM (#16539561)

Tbf this Hacker News, a casual social forum.

I’m indifferent to concerns about rigor in my comments. Also I’m on a phone and half interested, passing the time on a bus.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Peter Thiel’s Money Talks, in Contentious Ways. But What ... by stcredzero on Wednesday March 07, 2018 @03:37PM (#16539638)

Many people who assert things about James Damore's memo are engaging in the same dishonest anti-science tactics which Climate Deniers and Evolution Deniers engage in. Science is not a democracy. People also don't get to impute James Damore's motives just because they feel strongly about it.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=siRG42yMpyc

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=grNAjsb4yX8

Look up the citations, then decide for yourself who is pushing an ideological agenda.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YKmyO3hbOz8

Here is a reasonable and cogent critique of the Damore memo. Liana K makes a very good argument that James Damore is wrong. However, note how many general falsehoods about the memo she calls out.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BIRvtA2JIIA&

[ Parent | on HN ]