News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Bazel Fawlty.

Re:Bazel Fawlty by pvg on Tuesday March 06, 2018 @07:45AM (#16528453)
What's the context for this - as in, the 'we' in question and the thing they were building with bazel? And are they really posting from March 16, 2018?
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Bazel Fawlty by danmux on Tuesday March 06, 2018 @08:43AM (#16528767)
I probably should have made the context clearer earlier in the post - later on I mention :

"To set the scene, our codebase is mainly Go, including vendor directories, and a considerable amount of data compiled in, we have 2.5M lines of code, a full build from a clean clone on one of our Jenkins slaves takes 1 minute.

We had between 8 and 20 engineers working on that codebase. Importantly we all develop on Mac, but run in production in linux."

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Bazel Fawlty by ndh2 on Tuesday March 06, 2018 @08:01AM (#16528538)
Well, one section is suspiciously titled Back to the Future.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Bazel Fawlty by danmux on Tuesday March 06, 2018 @08:26AM (#16528655)
hahah. oops.
[ Parent | on HN ]