TunSafe: A High Performance WireGuard Client for Windows

Re:TunSafe: A High Performance WireGuard Client for Windows by fulafel on Sunday March 04, 2018 @01:23PM (#16515745)

Is it implemented in a memory safe language?

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:TunSafe: A High Performance WireGuard Client for Windows by zx2c4 on Sunday March 04, 2018 @03:24PM (#16516487)

We've got two official WireGuard open source clients coming in the pipeline for Windows and macOS -- one in Rust and another in Go. (Neither are TunSafe, which is C++.)

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:TunSafe: A High Performance WireGuard Client for Windows by ludde on Sunday March 04, 2018 @05:34PM (#16517199)

The only 'supported' WireGuard implementation that exists is written by you in C, yet you complain that my C++ implementation lacks memory safety. Where is the logic?

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:TunSafe: A High Performance WireGuard Client for Windows by nostream on Sunday March 04, 2018 @05:02PM (#16517043)

zx2c4: Which language is the linux version of wireguard written in?

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:TunSafe: A High Performance WireGuard Client for Windows by rumpelsepp on Sunday March 11, 2018 @04:44AM (#16562229)

the reference implementation is a linux kernel module: https://git.zx2c4.com/WireGuard/

there are currently at least two actively developped open source userspace implementations in different languages. Two examples are Go and Rust:

https://git.zx2c4.com/wireguard-go/ https://git.zx2c4.com/wireguard-rs/

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:TunSafe: A High Performance WireGuard Client for Windows by ludde on Sunday March 04, 2018 @01:26PM (#16515774)

No, it's implemented in C++.

[ Parent | on HN ]